6 Comments
User's avatar
Contrary to Ordinary's avatar

I am flabbergasted that this is the first comment on this excellent piece. I just sent it to Nate Silver in hopes he would come out to play.

I am curious to know your thoughts in light of yesterday’s event. It seems to me that Scenario 6 now makes the most sense.

Most importantly, thank you for sharing your insights. I enjoyed going through the thought exercise with you!

Expand full comment
David Reaboi's avatar

Thank you very much. I wonder what Silver would say. I'm thinking through how the recent assassination attempt changes anything, if it does at all.

Expand full comment
Contrary to Ordinary's avatar

You called it! 👍

Expand full comment
Contrary to Ordinary's avatar

One more thought… perhaps the DNC picks S1, decides to take the (presumed) losses and keep the powder dry for another round of the Resistance. If there is an upside surprise, so much the better.

Expand full comment
Contrary to Ordinary's avatar

I think it leaves Scenario 5 & 6 as the only mutually beneficial options for the Biden’s and the DNC. For Harris, or any other D candidate, not so much. (In my half-dozen re-readings of your piece, I’ve considered Harris as proxy for any alternative candidate). With four months and change to Nov 5 anything can happen, including S5, which could be a case of be careful what you wish for.

Expand full comment
Rich Helppie The Common Bridge's avatar

Well written. On The Common Bridge, I wrote a piece that reached similar conclusions, i.e., the no-lose course for the DNC is to replace Biden with Harris at the top of the ticket. Will try to link to it here if Substack allows.

https://thecommonbridge.substack.com/p/kamala-harris-for-president

Expand full comment